Crash, boom, bang
Affordances for participation in sound art
Keywords:sound art, participation, pragmatism, mediation, affordance
Audience participation is a prominent thread running through much of sound art practice, yet it remains largely absent from the sound art scholarship. In this article, I argue that the most widespread methodologies employed in sound art research – roughly split into the phenomenological branch and the object-oriented branch – are ill equipped to tackle the questions of sociality and participation. Instead, I offer a framework for the study of participation in sound art – and, more broadly, for sound aesthetics in general – rooted in the pragmatist tradition. My starting point is John Dewey’s conceptualization of an artwork as an aesthetic experience developing in cycles of doing and undergoing – a structure, he claims, present in both the creative process and the reception of artworks, putting them on equal footing. I then expand this notion by turning to the contemporary pragmatist trends in creativity studies, ANT and affordance theory, introducing the concepts of we-creativity, mediation and affordance. The second half of the article focuses specifically on affordance – a relationship between a sound artwork and its audience delimiting and facilitating the possibilities for participation. I discuss the low-level affordances (facilitating elementary action) for creative listening and soundmaking and high-level affordances (facilitating complex behaviors) for creativity, experimentation and connectivity. I conclude that the pragmatist framework allows to go beyond the subject- or object-centeredness of phenomenological or object-oriented methodologies, bringing to the foreground the relational and social character of sound art.
Baschet, F. (1999). Les sculptures sonores. Chemsford: Soundworld.
Baschet, F., & Baschet, B. (1987). Sound sculpture: sounds, shapes, public participation, education. Leonardo, 20(2), 107–114.
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso Books.
Born, G. (2005). On musical mediation: ontology, technology and creativity. Twentieth-Century Music, 2(1), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147857220500023X
Born, G. (2019). On nonhuman sound: sound as relation. In R. Chow & J. Steintrager (Eds.), Sound Objects (pp. 185–208). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Les Presses du réel.
Brincker, M. (2015). The aesthetic stance – on the conditions and consequences of becoming a beholder. In A. Scarinzi (Ed.), Aesthetics and the embodied mind: beyond art theory and the Cartesian mind-body dichotomy (pp. 117–138). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2018). The affordances of social media platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, & T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 233–253). London: SAGE Publications.
Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
Cox, C. (2011). Beyond representation and signification: toward a sonic materialism. Journal of Visual Culture, 10(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412911402880
Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience (23rd ed.). Perigree Books.
Engström, A., & Stjerna, Å. (2009). Sound art or Klangkunst? A reading of the German and English literature on sound art. Organised Sound, 14(01), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135577180900003X
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Glaveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.
Glaveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: the five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528
Glaveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., Biaisi, P.-M. de, Desainte-Catherine, M., … Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00176
Goehr, L. (1994). The imaginary museum of musical works: an essay in the philosophy of music. Clarendon Press.
Grimshaw, M. (2015). A brief argument for, and summary of, the concept of Sonic Virtuality. Dansk Musikforskning Online, Special ed, 81–98.
Groth, S. K., & Samson, K. (2017). Sound art situations. Organised Sound, 22(01), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771816000388
Harries, G. (2013). ‘The open work’: ecologies of participation. Organised Sound, 18(01), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771812000192
Hennion, A. (2015). The passion for music: a sociology of mediation. Ashgate.
Hennion, A. (2016). From ANT to pragmatism: a journey with Bruno Latour at the CSI. New Literary History, 47, 289–308.
Hogg, B., & Östersjö, S. (2015). ‘Patterns of ecological and aesthetic co-evolution’: tree-guitars, river-violins and the ecology of listening. Contemporary Music Review, 34(4), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2016.1140867
Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and voice : phenomenologies of sound. New York: SUNY Press.
Kahn, D. (2014). Sound art, art, music. Tacet, 3, 329–347.
Kester, G. H. (2011). The one and the many : contemporary collaborative art in a global context. Duke University Press.
Keylin, V. (2015). Corporeality of music and sound sculpture. Organised Sound, 20(02), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771815000060
Kim-Cohen, S. (2009). In the blink of an ear: toward a non-cochlear sonic art. New York-London: Continuum.
LaBelle, B. (2015). Background noise: perspectives on sound art (2nd ed.). New York: Bloomsbury.
Landy, L. (2017). But is it (also) music. In M. Cobussen, V. Meelberg, & B. Truax (Eds.), Routledge companion to sounding art (p. eBook edition). Routledge.
Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leduc, K. (2013). Art as affordance. Totem: The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), 51–58.
Maes, L., & Leman, M. (2017). Defining sound art. In M. Cobussen, V. Meelberg, & B. Truax (Eds.), Routledge companion to sounding art (p. eBook edition). Routledge.
Maier, C. J., & Schulze, H. (2017). The tacit grooves of sound art. Aesthetic artefacts as analogue archives. SoundEffects, 7(3), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.7146/se.v7i3.105227
Nancy, J.-L. (2007). Listening. Fordham University Press.
Neuhaus, M. (1994). The broadcast works and audium. In Zeitgleich: the symposium, the seminar, the exhibition. Vienna: Triton. Retrieved from http://www.max-neuhaus.info/soundworks/vectors/networks/Broadcast_Works_and_Audium.pdf
Neuhaus, M., & Jardins, G. des (Eds.). (1994). Max Neuhaus : sound works. Vol. 1: Inscription. Ostfildern: Cantz.
Polli, A. (2017). Soundwalking, sonification and activism. In M. Cobussen, V. Meelberg, & B. Truax (Eds.), Routledge companion to sounding art (p. eBook edition). London-New York: Routledge.
Rebelo, P., & Velloso, R. C. (2018). Participatory sonic arts: the Som de Maré project – towards a socially engaged art of sound in the everyday. In S. Emmerson (Ed.), The Routledge research companion to electronic music - reaching out with technology (pp. 137–155). London-New York: Routledge.
Samson, A., & Soon, W. (2015). Network affordances: the unpredictable parameters of a Hong Kong SPEED SHOW. The Fibreculture Journal, (24). Retrieved from http://twentyfour.fibreculturejournal.org/2015/06/04/44/
Schoeneberg, A. (1970). Fundamentals of music composition. Faber and Faber.
Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past. Duke University Press.
Strachan, R. (2013). The spectacular suburb: creativity and affordance in contemporary electronic music and sound art. SoundEffects, 3(3), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.7146/se.v3i3.15732
Tanaka, A., & Parkinson, A. (2018). The problems with participation. In S. Emmerson (Ed.), Routledge companion to electronic music: reaching out with technology (pp. 156–177). Routledge.
Voegelin, S. (2010). Listening to noise and silence: toward a philosophy of sound art. New York-London: Continuum.
Vogel, P. (1996). Peter Vogel : Interaktive Objekte, eine retrospektive. Mainz: Skulpturenmuseum Glaskasten.
Wong, M.-S. (2012). Sound art. Retrieved February 22, 2018, from http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-1002219538
How to Cite
The journal allow the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions.